Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 3:47:53 GMT
Expert appeals to what she has learned in these months: “We know that in summer, with more time outside, we will not need the mask as much; in winter, on the contrary.” The most complete study on the mask corroborates its effectiveness A constant source of uncertainty for those responsible for managing the pandemic, and the citizens themselves, has been determining how much non-pharmacological measures really protect against contagion. For the first time, a meta-analysis – a work that analyzes results from several studies on a topic – evaluates the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of masks, interpersonal distance and hand washing, and concludes that, indeed, these measures “ "They are associated with a reduction in the incidence of covid.
For the first time, a large study analyzes the effectiveness of masks, interpersonal distance and hand washing, and concludes that, indeed, these measures “are associated with a reduction in the incidence of covid-19” The study, which pools results from eight works – after evaluating more Australia Phone Number than seventy – is published in BMJ . Their conclusion – explained here graphically – may seem obvious, but the truth is that the lack of research on the effectiveness of behavioral measures is considered one of the great gaps in pandemic science. Lack of studies on the effectiveness of behavioral measures The editors of BMJ state in an editorial: “Although extensive trials of vaccines and drug treatments have been carried out during the pandemic, much less has been done to evaluate the effects of social and public health measures.” The lack of “good research” in this area is for BMJ “a pandemic tragedy.” The experts consulted fully agree.
This work is valuable because it is the first to analyze in depth the effectiveness of behavioral measures,” says Ruiz Cantero, “but it also highlights the deficiencies in research; He tells us: 'we are like this and this is where we have to go.'” Specifically, the study highlights – Ruiz Cantero points out – the need for analyzes that measure indicators in the same way, to make comparison possible. Prospective studies designed so that the individual effect of each of the protective measures can be observed in isolation is also needed. The authors of the work now published in BMJ acknowledge that this has now been practically impossible. Combined effect of several measures Ángela Domínguez is of the same opinion: “The study by Stella Talic and collaborators jointly analyzes the results of studies published by different authors on the effectiveness of non-pharmacological prevention measures, such as hand hygiene.
For the first time, a large study analyzes the effectiveness of masks, interpersonal distance and hand washing, and concludes that, indeed, these measures “are associated with a reduction in the incidence of covid-19” The study, which pools results from eight works – after evaluating more Australia Phone Number than seventy – is published in BMJ . Their conclusion – explained here graphically – may seem obvious, but the truth is that the lack of research on the effectiveness of behavioral measures is considered one of the great gaps in pandemic science. Lack of studies on the effectiveness of behavioral measures The editors of BMJ state in an editorial: “Although extensive trials of vaccines and drug treatments have been carried out during the pandemic, much less has been done to evaluate the effects of social and public health measures.” The lack of “good research” in this area is for BMJ “a pandemic tragedy.” The experts consulted fully agree.
This work is valuable because it is the first to analyze in depth the effectiveness of behavioral measures,” says Ruiz Cantero, “but it also highlights the deficiencies in research; He tells us: 'we are like this and this is where we have to go.'” Specifically, the study highlights – Ruiz Cantero points out – the need for analyzes that measure indicators in the same way, to make comparison possible. Prospective studies designed so that the individual effect of each of the protective measures can be observed in isolation is also needed. The authors of the work now published in BMJ acknowledge that this has now been practically impossible. Combined effect of several measures Ángela Domínguez is of the same opinion: “The study by Stella Talic and collaborators jointly analyzes the results of studies published by different authors on the effectiveness of non-pharmacological prevention measures, such as hand hygiene.