Post by anik4600 on Feb 27, 2024 5:49:47 GMT
The dissenting vote of Minister Alexandre de Moraes prevailed, who considered the collection of the contribution constitutional. According to the minister, the court's consolidated jurisprudence is that revenue, for tax purposes, has always been considered revenue from sales of goods and services. "And the contested rule did not establish a new type of contribution, since the basis for calculating the contribution provided for there — contribution due to social security by the employer, legal entity, dedicated to rural production — is the gross revenue resulting from its commercialization , is equivalent to the concept of billing, according to the case law transcribed above." In this sense, the minister understood that, in this case, the complementary law is unnecessary.
Furthermore, according to Alexandre, the constitutional prohibition prevents the event or calculation basis specific to an existing tax or social contribution, however, the creation of a social contribution provided for in the text is not prohibited. constitutional with a taxable event or calculation basis identical to those of an existing tax. The minister highlighted that the con Venezuela Mobile Number List tribution provided for in Law 8,870/199 and Cofins were already authorized by the Federal Constitution. "There is therefore no bis in idem not authorized by the Federal Constitution", he concluded. With information from the STF press office.The Plenary of the Federal Supreme Court began to judge this Wednesday (15/3) whether the changes in legislation that allow the offering of interstate and international public passenger transport services without prior bidding, through simple authorization, are valid.
Bilanol/freepik Actions question permission to grant transport services via bilanol/freepik authorization The hearing had oral arguments from the authors of the two direct unconstitutionality actions judged, the Attorney General's Office and the National Association of Road Passenger Transport Companies (Anatrip), in addition to amici curiae . The trial will resume in this Thursday's session (16/3). Law 10,233/2001, which provided for the restructuring of waterway and land transport, required that the granting of transport services be made by means of permission. For a service permit to take place, there must be a prior bidding process.
Furthermore, according to Alexandre, the constitutional prohibition prevents the event or calculation basis specific to an existing tax or social contribution, however, the creation of a social contribution provided for in the text is not prohibited. constitutional with a taxable event or calculation basis identical to those of an existing tax. The minister highlighted that the con Venezuela Mobile Number List tribution provided for in Law 8,870/199 and Cofins were already authorized by the Federal Constitution. "There is therefore no bis in idem not authorized by the Federal Constitution", he concluded. With information from the STF press office.The Plenary of the Federal Supreme Court began to judge this Wednesday (15/3) whether the changes in legislation that allow the offering of interstate and international public passenger transport services without prior bidding, through simple authorization, are valid.
Bilanol/freepik Actions question permission to grant transport services via bilanol/freepik authorization The hearing had oral arguments from the authors of the two direct unconstitutionality actions judged, the Attorney General's Office and the National Association of Road Passenger Transport Companies (Anatrip), in addition to amici curiae . The trial will resume in this Thursday's session (16/3). Law 10,233/2001, which provided for the restructuring of waterway and land transport, required that the granting of transport services be made by means of permission. For a service permit to take place, there must be a prior bidding process.